#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer pdf#
#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer software#
#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer license#
#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer download#

A first insight on COVID-19 contact tracing in Maryland.

What does release from home isolation mean in Maryland?.

Moving from US to Belgium during a pandemic.

COVID-19 hospitalization by age in Maryland.

A third of Maryland counties tested more than 25% of residents.

COVID-19 cases in Maryland congregate living facilities.

I’m not sure this was the original intention of Highslide Software.

#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer pdf#

So the “trick” here would be that, by changing the medium on which you display end-results (from website to paper, even if it’s in PDF on the journal website), you can use the free-to-download license, even in a commercial environment, for an article from a commercial company.

#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer software#

On the other hand, no one ever questioned the fact commercial companies have licenses for all the proprietary software they use to produce anything else, from charts to statistical data, just because they publish results with these software as tools.

#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer download#

If a company choose to use Highcharts internally to render some beautiful charts and just publish (*) the resulting image, I guess they can just download the library and use it (* by “publishing”, I mean: publish a scientific paper in a peer-reviewed journal, not publishing on its website).

#Gitize hundred graph engauge digitizer license#

the resulting chart, in a commercial environment? What is covered by the license is just the re-use of the javascript library in a website, not the resulting chart. Now what if we only need the end-product, i.e. there is a commercial license for any other website.there is a first Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License: you can use the library for your non-profit website (see details on the licensing page).The only negative point imho is that it is dual-licensed and all cases deprive you from your freedom: This library can produce beautiful charts of various types with some Ajax interaction. In one of his buzz, Cédric Bonhomme drew my attention on the Highcharts javascript library. But I find this presentation really more appealing and meaningful than the stacked bar graph. Of course, if your criteria for “sexiness” is that there shouldn’t be any digit on your chart, then this chart is not sexy.

In addition to the graph above, one can notice there isn’t any severity levels A, B, F and G represented and we can quickly grasp the proportions between the different incidences. You still see where the incidence is the highest (in age ranges 4 and 5), what levels of severity are the most important (C, with lower but approximately similar levels of D, E and H). You just format the table nicely and add some colour gradient. Actually everything was already in the table. If one wants to clearly display both the whole and its parts, Steven Few recommends to either use two graphs next to each other or a combination bar and line graph (with two quantitative scales).Īs I’m not really interested in the whole but mainly in the parts and their relative distribution, I suggest another way to present the data. And that this type of graph shouldn’t be used if the distribution changes must be shown more precisely. Inside, on pages 135-136, one can read stacked bar graphs are the right choice only when you must display multiple instances of a whole and its parts, with emphasis primarily on the whole. This reminded me I read a book written by Steven Few, a few years ago: Information Dashboard Design (O’Reilly Media, 2006). And Steven Few also participated in his forum here. Then in a post on Junk Charts, someone mentioned Steven Few who would have said “not to use stacked bar charts because you cannot compare individual values very easily and as a rule avoid stacked bars with more than six or seven divisions”. I looked on the web but couldn’t find much information apart from the fact “ The Economist says they’re so bad at conveying information, that they’re a great way to hide a bad number amongst good ones” (but are still using them in their graphic detail section) or “ a stacked column chart with percentages should always extend to 100%” (this doesn’t really apply here).

(it’s even worst when some age ranges don’t have any incidence at all: what is happening?).

how can we compare levels C, D and E in age ranges 4 and 5?.

what are the different levels of severity in age ranges 1, 2 and 3?.

The chart shows that the disease especially affects age ranges 4 and 5, at different severity levels. That incidence is split by 8 severity levels.

The chart shows the incidence of disease X in various age ranges. This afternoon I received a bunch of data accompanied by stacked bar graphs for each dataset.